The below criteria will be evaluated on a scale of 1-5. The numbers correspond to the following: Poor (1), Need Improvement (2), Satisfactory (3), Good (4), Excellent (5)

Each reviewer will also have the opportunity to write down their overall comments regarding the compatibility of each submission with COR-NTD’s mission statement and issues regarding equity between topics and regions. 

1. Research focus

2. Alignment with our research priorities and/or WHO Road Map

3. Level of country representation

4. Quality of speakers, moderators, and organizers (if known)

5. Feasibility of execution

6. Likelihood of resulting in OR questions